4.6 Review

Association of prognostic nutritional index with risk of contrast induced nephropathy: A meta-analysis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1154409

Keywords

prognostic nutritional index; contrast-induced nephropathy; percutaneous coronary intervention; myocardial infarction; coronary angiography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis examined the association between the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing coronary angiography. The analysis showed that patients with a low PNI had a higher risk of CIN. Other risk factors for CIN included diabetes and hypertension, while male gender and the use of statins were associated with a lower risk of CIN.
Background: Although prognostic nutritional index (PNI) has been frequently applied in patients with malignancy or those during postoperative recovery, whether it is also an optimal indicator of the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients receiving coronary angiography remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aimed at investigating the clinical association of PNI with the risk of CIN in patients receiving coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention.Methods: Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google scholar were searched for studies until January 2023. The relationship between CIN risk and PNI (i.e., low vs. high) (primary outcome) as well as other variables (secondary outcomes) were analyzed using a random-effects model.Results: Overall, 10 observational studies with 17,590 patients (pooled incidence of CIN: 18%) were eligible for analysis. There was a higher risk of CIN in patients with a low PNI compared to those with a high PNI [odd ratio (OR) = 3.362, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.054 to 5.505, p < 0.0001, I-2 = 89.6%, seven studies, 12,972 patients, certainty of evidence: very low]. Consistently, a lower PNI was noted in patients with CIN compared to those without (Mean difference = -5.1, 95% CI: -6.87 to -3.33, p < 0.00001, I-2 = 96%, eight studies, 15,516 patients, certainty of evidence: very low). Other risks of CIN included diabetes and hypertension, while male gender and the use of statins were associated with a lower risk of CIN. Patients with CIN were older, had a higher creatinine level, and received a higher contrast volume compared to those without. On the other hand, pre-procedural albumin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, ejection fraction, hemoglobin, lymphocyte ratio were found to be lower in patients with CIN than in those without.Conclusion: This meta-analysis highlighted an inverse association of PNI with the risk of CIN, which required further studies for verification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available