4.6 Article

The T6SS-Dependent Effector Re78 of Rhizobium etli Mim1 Benefits Bacterial Competition

Journal

BIOLOGY-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biology12050678

Keywords

type six secretion; new effector-immunity pair; Rhizobium-legume symbiosis; bacterial competition; nodule; T6SS

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The genes of the T6SS system in Rhizobium etli Mim1 were divided into three modules, which were found to be unnecessary for effective nodulation with beans. The expression of the T6SS system was observed to be lower in symbiosis compared to free living. The secretion of Re78 protein required an active T6SS system, and Re78 and Re79 proteins were identified as a toxic effector/immunity protein pair.
The genes of the type VI secretion system (T6SS) from Rhizobium etli Mim1 (ReMim1) that contain possible effectors can be divided into three modules. The mutants in them indicated that they are not required for effective nodulation with beans. To analyze T6SS expression, a putative promoter region between the tssA and tssH genes was fused in both orientations to a reporter gene. Both fusions are expressed more in free living than in symbiosis. When the module-specific genes were studied using RT-qPCR, a low expression was observed in free living and in symbiosis, which was clearly lower than the structural genes. The secretion of Re78 protein from the T6SS gene cluster was dependent on the presence of an active T6SS. Furthermore, the expression of Re78 and Re79 proteins in E. coli without the ReMim1 nanosyringe revealed that these proteins behave as a toxic effector/immunity protein pair (E/I). The harmful action of Re78, whose mechanism is still unknown, would take place in the periplasmic space of the target cell. The deletion of this ReMim1 E/I pair resulted in reduced competitiveness for bean nodule occupancy and in lower survival in the presence of the wild-type strain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available