4.6 Article

Adventitial adaptive immune cells are associated with ascending aortic dilatation in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1127685

Keywords

thoracic aorta aneurysm; aortic dissection; multiplex immunohistochemistry; bicuspid aortc valve; inflammation; tertiary lymphoid structures; auto-inflammation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals a significant presence of immune cells in dilating aortas of patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). These findings raise the question of whether immune cells in BAV aortopathy are innocent bystanders or contribute to the deterioration of the aortic wall.
BackgroundBicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is associated with ascending aorta aneurysms and dissections. Presently, genetic factors and pathological flow patterns are considered responsible for aneurysm formation in BAV while the exact role of inflammatory processes remains unknown. MethodsIn order to objectify inflammation, we employ a highly sensitive, quantitative immunohistochemistry approach. Whole slides of dissected, dilated and non-dilated ascending aortas from BAV patients were quantitatively analyzed. ResultsDilated aortas show a 4-fold increase of lymphocytes and a 25-fold increase in B lymphocytes in the adventitia compared to non-dilated aortas. Tertiary lymphoid structures with B cell follicles and helper T cell expansion were identified in dilated and dissected aortas. Dilated aortas were associated with an increase in M1-like macrophages in the aorta media, in contrast the number of M2-like macrophages did not change significantly. ConclusionThis study finds unexpected large numbers of immune cells in dilating aortas of BAV patients. These findings raise the question whether immune cells in BAV aortopathy are innocent bystanders or contribute to the deterioration of the aortic wall.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available