4.5 Article

Next-generation sequencing analysis of hepatitis C virus resistance-associated substitutions in direct-acting antiviral failure in South Korea

Journal

CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 496-509

Publisher

KOREAN ASSOC STUDY LIVER
DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0345

Keywords

Hepatitis C virus; Genotype; Drug resistance; viral; Next-generation sequencing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, next-generation sequencing was used to analyze resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) and retreatment outcomes in South Korean patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who failed direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) treatment. The results showed that baseline NS3 and NS5A RASs were commonly present, and there was an increasing trend of NS5A RASs after failed DAA treatment in genotype 1b patients. However, RASs were rarely present in genotype 2 patients treated with sofosbuvir+ribavirin. Overall, retreatment with pan-genotypic DAA was highly successful in Korea, and active retreatment after unsuccessful DAA treatment is encouraged.
Background/Aims: We used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) and retreatment outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who failed direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) treatment in South Korea.Methods: Using prospectively collected data from the Korean HCV cohort study, we recruited 36 patients who failed DAA treatment in 10 centers between 2007 and 2020; 29 blood samples were available from 24 patients. RASs were analyzed using NGS.Results: RASs were analyzed for 13 patients with genotype 1b, 10 with genotype 2, and one with genotype 3a. The unsuccessful DAA regimens were daclatasvir+asunaprevir (n=11), sofosbuvir+ribavirin (n=9), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (n=3), and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (n=1). In the patients with genotype 1b, NS3, NS5A, and NS5B RASs were detected in eight, seven, and seven of 10 patients at baseline and in four, six, and two of six patients after DAA failure, respectively. Among the 10 patients with genotype 2, the only baseline RAS was NS3 Y56F, which was detected in one patient. NS5A F28C was detected after DAA failure in a patient with genotype 2 infection who was erroneously treated with daclatasvir+asunaprevir. After retreatment, 16 patients had a 100% sustained virological response rate.Conclusions: NS3 and NS5A RASs were commonly present at baseline, and there was an increasing trend of NS5A RASs after failed DAA treatment in genotype 1b. However, RASs were rarely present in patients with genotype 2 who were treated with sofosbuvir+ribavirin. Despite baseline or treatment-emergent RASs, retreatment with pan-genotypic DAA was highly successful in Korea, so we encourage active retreatment after unsuccessful DAA treatment. (Clin Mol Hepatol 2023;29:496-509)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available