4.7 Article

Correlated variability in primate superior colliculus depends on functional class

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04912-0

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Correlated variability in neuronal activity can constrain information readout from populations of neurons. Traditionally, it is reported as a single value summarizing a brain area, but this may obscure underlying features. In the macaque superior colliculus, different functional classes of neurons exhibit distinct levels of correlated variability, with delay class neurons showing the highest levels during working memory tasks. Considering functional subpopulations is important for understanding population coding principles.
Correlated variability in neuronal activity (spike count correlations, r(SC)) can constrain how information is read out from populations of neurons. Traditionally, r(SC) is reported as a single value summarizing a brain area. However, single values, like summary statistics, stand to obscure underlying features of the constituent elements. We predict that in brain areas containing distinct neuronal subpopulations, different subpopulations will exhibit distinct levels of r(SC) that are not captured by the population r(SC). We tested this idea in macaque superior colliculus (SC), a structure containing several functional classes (i.e., subpopulations) of neurons. We found that during saccade tasks, different functional classes exhibited differing degrees of r(SC). Delay class neurons displayed the highest r(SC), especially during saccades that relied on working memory. Such dependence of r(SC) on functional class and cognitive demand underscores the importance of taking functional subpopulations into account when attempting to model or infer population coding principles. Electrophysiological recordings in the macaque superior colliculus reveal that correlated variability (r(SC)) depends on functional class.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available