4.7 Article

Cortical recurrence supports resilience to sensory variance in the primary visual cortex

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05042-3

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identifies two typical response types of neurons in the cat primary visual cortex to sensory variance. One type of response is resilient to changes in variance and co-encodes the sensory feature and its variance, improving the quality of orientation encoding. The existence of these variance-specific responses can be explained by a model of intracortical recurrent connectivity.
Our daily endeavors occur in a complex visual environment, whose intrinsic variability challenges the way we integrate information to make decisions. By processing myriads of parallel sensory inputs, our brain is theoretically able to compute the variance of its environment, a cue known to guide our behavior. Yet, the neurobiological and computational basis of such variance computations are still poorly understood. Here, we quantify the dynamics of sensory variance modulations of cat primary visual cortex neurons. We report two archetypal neuronal responses, one of which is resilient to changes in variance and co-encodes the sensory feature and its variance, improving the population encoding of orientation. The existence of these variance-specific responses can be accounted for by a model of intracortical recurrent connectivity. We thus propose that local recurrent circuits process uncertainty as a generic computation, advancing our understanding of how the brain handles naturalistic inputs. Two populations of V1 neurons are described that are either vulnerable or resilient to variance of oriented inputs and these features can be reproduced in a well-established model of intracortical V1 recurrence and interpreted within a Bayesian framework.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available