4.7 Article

Robotic Single-Site Radical Hysterectomy for Early Cervical Cancer: A Single Center Experience of 5 Years

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Oncology

Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries

Hyuna Sung et al.

Summary: The global cancer burden in 2020 saw an estimated 19.3 million new cancer cases and almost 10.0 million cancer deaths. Female breast cancer surpassed lung cancer as the most commonly diagnosed cancer, while lung cancer remained the leading cause of cancer death. These trends are expected to rise in 2040, with transitioning countries experiencing a larger increase compared to transitioned countries due to demographic changes and risk factors associated with globalization and a growing economy. Efforts to improve cancer prevention measures and provision of cancer care in transitioning countries will be crucial for global cancer control.

CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2021)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Trends of cervical cancer at global, regional, and national level: data from the Global Burden of Disease study 2019

Xingxing Zhang et al.

Summary: The global trend of cervical cancer showed a decrease from 1990 to 2019, except for an increase in incidence in East Asia. Most countries/territories experienced a decreasing trend in cervical cancer, but some, like Lesotho, Zimbabwe, and Bulgaria, showed increasing trends. The findings emphasize the ongoing need for more effective prevention and control strategies for cervical cancer globally.

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH (2021)

Article Surgery

Robotic single-site versus multiport radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: An analysis of 62 cases from a single institution

Tae-Kyu Jang et al.

Summary: The study found that RSSRH and RMPRH have comparable surgical outcomes in early stage cervical cancer, with RSSRH having significantly shorter postoperative hospital discharge and total hospital costs compared to RMPRH, while RMPRH had a significantly higher lymph node retrieval.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY (2021)

Article Oncology

Comparison of therapeutic effects of chemo-radiotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical surgery in patients with bulky cervical carcinoma (stage IB3 & IIA2)

Setareh Akhavan et al.

Summary: Comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical hysterectomy (NACTRH) with chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) in patients with bulky cervical cancer (stage IB3 & IIA2), it was found that NACTRH is associated with higher overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates compared to CRT.

BMC CANCER (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy

Jona Roeseler et al.

Summary: This study systematically assessed disease-free survival, overall survival, and morbidity rates after surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer and discussed the impact of the LACC trial on clinical routine. The LACC trial found higher disease progression and recurrence rates with minimally invasive surgery compared to open radical hysterectomy, but there were conflicting results and opinions from other studies. More randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the most suitable treatment for early-stage cervical cancer.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (2021)

Article Oncology

Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size < 2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study

Pengfei Li et al.

Summary: Among patients with stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm, whether the tumor is visible or not, the oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) among cervical cancer patients are comparable.

JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2021)

Review Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

Cervical Cancer: 2018 Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System and the Role of Imaging

Mohammed Saleh et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2020)

Article Oncology

Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system

Koji Matsuo et al.

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2019)

Review Oncology

Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019

Wui-Jin Koh et al.

JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK (2019)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Cervical cancer

Paul A. Cohen et al.

LANCET (2019)

Review Oncology

The management of locally advanced cervical cancer

Pushpa C. H. Naga et al.

CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY (2018)

Article Oncology

Robotic single site radical hysterectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancers

Enrico Vizza et al.

JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2018)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer

Pedro T. Ramirez et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2018)

Article Oncology

Recurrence of Early Stage Cervical Cancer After Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Surgery

Rosa Maria Laterza et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER (2016)

Review Oncology

Surgical Treatment of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

Sara Y. Brucker et al.

ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT (2016)

Article Oncology

Cervical Cancer, Version 2.2015 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines

Wui-Jin Koh et al.

JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK (2015)

Article Oncology

Classification of radical hysterectomy

Denis Querleu et al.

LANCET ONCOLOGY (2008)