4.7 Article

Using Modeling All Alternatives to explore 55% decarbonization scenarios of the European electricity sector

Journal

ISCIENCE
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106677

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate change mitigation is a global challenge that requires national-level authorities to resolve, similar to a "tragedy of the commons". This paradox is reflected in Europe, where climate commitments are made collectively by the EU but implementation is the responsibility of individual Member States. We investigated near-optimal effort-sharing scenarios for decarbonizing the European electricity sector between 55% and 75% relative to 1990, in line with 2030 ambitions. Our findings reveal that only specific effort-sharing schemes can achieve the theoretical minimum system cost, with most cases incurring an additional cost of at least 5%. The results highlight significant inequalities in the efforts required to decarbonize national electricity sectors.
Climate change mitigation is a global challenge that, however, needs to be resolved by national-level authorities, resembling a tragedy of the commons''. This paradox is reflected at the European scale, as climate commitments are made by the EU collectively, but implementation is the responsibility of individual Member States. Here, we investigate a suite of near-optimal effort-sharing scenarios where the European electricity sector is decarbonized between 55% and 75% relative to 1990, in linewith 2030 ambitions. To this end, we use a brownfield electricity system optimization model in combination with the Modeling All Alternatives methodology. Results show that only very particular effort-sharing schemes are able to reach the theoretical minimum system cost. In most cases, an additional cost of at least 5% is incurred. Results reveal large inequalities in the efforts required to decarbonize national electricity sectors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available