4.7 Article

Evaluation of Plasma Biomarkers for A/T/N Classification of Alzheimer Disease Among Adults of Caribbean Hispanic Ethnicity

Journal

JAMA NETWORK OPEN
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8214

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate validated plasma biomarkers for detecting Alzheimer's disease (AD) among Caribbean Hispanic individuals. The results showed that plasma P-tau181 and P-tau181/A beta 42 measurements could correctly classify whether Caribbean Hispanic individuals had AD, suggesting that plasma biomarkers can improve the detection of preclinical AD among asymptomatic individuals and the specificity of AD diagnosis.
IMPORTANCE Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma biomarkers can detect biological evidence of Alzheimer disease (AD), but their use in low-resource environments and among minority ethnic groups is limited. OBJECTIVE To assess validated plasma biomarkers for AD among adults of Caribbean Hispanic ethnicity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this decision analytical modeling study, adults were recruited between January 1, 2018, and April 30, 2022, and underwent detailed clinical assessments and venipuncture. A subsample of participants also consented to lumbar puncture. Established CSF cut points were used to define AD biomarker-positive status, allowing determination of optimal cut points for plasma biomarkers in the same individuals. The performance of a panel of 6 plasma biomarkers was then assessed with respect to the entire group. Data analysis was performed in January 2023. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Main outcomes were the association of plasma biomarkers amyloid-beta 1-42 (A beta 42), amyloid-beta 1-40 (A beta 40), total tau (T-tau), phosphorylated tau181 (P-tau181), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL) with AD diagnosis. These biomarkers allow assessment of amyloid (A), neurofibrillary degeneration (T), and neurodegeneration (N) aspects of AD. Statistical analyses performed included receiver operating characteristics, Pearson and Spearman correlations, t tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum, chi-square, and Fisher exact tests. EXPOSURES Exposures included age, sex, education, country of residence, apolipoprotein-e4 (APOE-epsilon 4) allele number, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and body mass index. RESULTS This study included 746 adults. Participants had a mean (SD) age of 71.0 ( 7.8) years, 480 (64.3%) were women, and 154 (20.6%) met clinical criteria for AD. Associations were observed between CSF and plasma P-tau181 (r = .47 [95% CI, 0.32-0.60]), NfL (r = 0.57 [95% CI, 0.44-0.68]), and P-tau181/A beta 42 (r = 0.44 [95% CI, 0.29-0.58]). For AD defined by CSF biomarkers, plasma P-tau181 and P-tau181/A beta 42 provided biological evidence of AD. Among individuals judged to be clinically healthy without dementia, biomarker-positive status was determined by plasma P-tau181 for 133 (22.7%) and by plasma P-tau181/A beta 42 for 104 (17.7%). Among individuals with clinically diagnosed AD, 69 (45.4%) had plasma P-tau181 levels and 89 (58.9%) had P-tau181/A beta 42 levels that were inconsistent with AD. Individuals with biomarker-negative clinical AD status tended to have lower levels of education, were less likely to carry APOE-epsilon 4 alleles, and had lower levels of GFAP and NfL than individuals with biomarker-positive clinical AD. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cross-sectional study, plasma P-tau181 and P-tau181/A beta 42 measurements correctly classified Caribbean Hispanic individuals with and without AD. However, plasma biomarkers identified individuals without dementia with biological evidence of AD, and a portion of those with dementia whose AD biomarker profile was negative. These results suggest that plasma biomarkers can augment detection of preclinical AD among asymptomatic individuals and improve the specificity of AD diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available