4.7 Article

Distributed Aperiodic Time-Triggered and Event-Triggered Consensus: A Scalability Viewpoint

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 1512-1524

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TNSE.2022.3227586

Keywords

Scalability; Stability criteria; Numerical stability; Multi-agent systems; Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions; Linear matrix inequalities; Laplace equations; Distributed control; consensus; sampled-data control; Lipschitz nonlinear multiagent systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, distributed sampled-data consensus problems are revisited from a scalability point of view. Existing solutions for estimating the maximum sampling interval that preserves stability rely on the Lyapunov functional method. In contrast, this paper proposes an easy-to-use and scalable method with stability conditions that are independent on the size of the network.
We revisit distributed sampled-data consensus problems from a scalability point of view. Existing solutions in the literature for estimating the maximum sampling interval that preserves stability rely on the Lyapunov functional method. With this method, the overall closed-loop system (i.e. the overall network of agents) is treated as a time-delayed system. Here, a critical point is the scalability of the resulting stability conditions: in fact, the size of the LMIs to be solved depends on the size of the network. In contrast with this method, an easy-to-use and scalable method is presented, with stability conditions that are independent on the size of the network. It is shown that the proposed method can handle linear and Lipschitz nonlinear multiagent systems with both aperiodic time-triggered and event-triggered control in a unified way. Numerical examples show the efficiency of the proposed approach and the tightness of the estimated maximum sampling interval.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available