4.6 Article

Influence of framework Al density in chabazite zeolites on copper ion mobility and reactivity during NOx selective catalytic reduction with NH3

Journal

NATURE CATALYSIS
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages 276-285

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41929-023-00932-5

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, Cu-CHA zeolites with different aluminum densities (0.2-1.7 Al/CHA) were investigated using statistical simulations, steady-state kinetics, and operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy. The results show that increasing the aluminum density leads to an increase in the fraction of Cu-I ions that are SCR active and the Cu-I oxidation rate constants, providing insights into how anionic Al centers in zeolite frameworks regulate the mobility of ionically tethered Cu cations and their dynamic reactivity during low-temperature NOx SCR.
Cu zeolites catalyse low-temperature (<523 K) selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of nitrogen oxides (NOx) via a redox cycle involving dynamic interconversion between NH3-solvated mononuclear Cu-I and binuclear Cu-II complexes. Cu-I oxidation requires the pairing of two mobilized Cu-I(NH3)(2) complexes to form binuclear intermediates, implying that Cu-I oxidation kinetics should depend on framework Al density, given that Cu ions are ionically tethered to anionic charges at Al sites in zeolite lattices. Here we combine statistical simulations, steady-state kinetics and operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy to interrogate Cu-chabazite (Cu-CHA) zeolites of varying framework Al density (0.2-1.7 Al centres per cha cage). Increasing the Al density leads to systematic increases in both the fraction of Cu-I ions that are SCR active (that is, O-2 oxidizable) and Cu-I oxidation rate constants (per Cu), revealing insights into how anionic Al centres in zeolite frameworks regulate the mobility of ionically tethered Cu cations and their dynamic reactivity during low-temperature NOx SCR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available