4.7 Article

Meta-Learning for Zero-Shot Remote Sensing Image Super-Resolution

Journal

MATHEMATICS
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math11071653

Keywords

deep learning; super-resolution; meta-learning; zero-shot

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zero-shot super-resolution (ZSSR) has attracted much attention for its flexibility in various applications, but is ineffective for large-scale low-resolution image sets due to computational demands. To address this, we propose a novel meta-learning model that treats low-resolution images as ZSSR tasks and learns meta-knowledge. This approach reduces the computational burden and enhances the generalization capacity of ZSSR. Experimental results demonstrate its impressive performance and superiority over other state-of-the-art methods.
Zero-shot super-resolution (ZSSR) has generated a lot of interest due to its flexibility in various applications. However, the computational demands of ZSSR make it ineffective when dealing with large-scale low-resolution image sets. To address this issue, we propose a novel meta-learning model. We treat the set of low-resolution images as a collection of ZSSR tasks and learn meta-knowledge about ZSSR by leveraging these tasks. This approach reduces the computational burden of super-resolution for large-scale low-resolution images. Additionally, through multiple ZSSR task learning, we uncover a general super-resolution model that enhances the generalization capacity of ZSSR. Finally, using the learned meta-knowledge, our model achieves impressive results with just a few gradient updates when given a novel task. We evaluate our method using two remote sensing datasets with varying spatial resolutions. Our experimental results demonstrate that using multiple ZSSR tasks yields better outcomes than a single task, and our method outperforms other state-of-the-art super-resolution methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available