4.6 Article

Effect of twist on indentation resistance

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 35, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105616

Keywords

Mechanical metamaterial; Continuum mechanics; Finite-element modelling (FEM); Mechanical testing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of twist on indentation resistance was tested using various chiral lattices. It was found that the twisted lattice had about 70% higher indentation force compared to the non-twisted lattice. The results were in reasonable agreement with calculations using micropolar and Willis' plane stress moduli.
With mechanical metamaterials that display force-torque coupling receiving recent attention, we tested the effect of twist on indentation resistance. We hypothesised that the force required to indent a twisting lattice to a set depth would increase with the amount of transverse deformation caused by twist. Based on previous work, various chiral lattices were designed to twist by up to 1.3 degrees per 1 % compression. These lattice designs were 3D-printed in Nylon-12, then tested, with the experiments replicated in finite element simulations. Indentation resistance increased with twist; the lattice with maximum twist required similar to 70 % higher indentation force (when normalised to compressive stiffness) than the non-twisting (antichiral) one during spherical indentations to 1 % of sample thickness. Further, we calculate the expected effects of twist on indentation resistance by combining the established micropolar and Willis' plane stress moduli with classical Hertzian indentation equations. We found reasonable agreement (within 10 %) between 2D calculation methods use here and previous 3D calculation methods. The indentation resistance calculated using the micropolar plane stress modulus followed the same trends as the simulations and experiments. The calculated indentation force was within 10 % of the simulations and experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available