4.6 Article

A new method for localized necking detection in uniaxial tensile testing based on a multi-camera DIC system

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 35, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106021

Keywords

Localized necking; Multi -camera DIC; Uniaxial tensile testing; Cross-sectional area

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new method for detecting the onset of localized necking in uniaxial tensile tests is presented in this paper, which uses a multi-camera digital image correlation system to measure the cross-sectional area at different positions of the sample. The effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed method are verified through a series of tensile tests and are compared with different localized necking detection methods.
Understanding and predicting the onset and behavior of localized necking is important for the design and optimization of structures and components. Capturing the onset of localized necking more accurately has been a challenge in experimental mechanics. In this paper, a new alternative method for detecting the onset of localized necking in uniaxial tensile tests is presented. This method is inspired by the fact that different behaviors are exhibited as localized necking starts at the different regions of the cross-sectional area. When localized necking begins to occur, the cross-sectional area in the center of the necking area decreases sharply, while the crosssectional area at the boundary of the necking area no longer decreases. A multi-camera digital image correlation system consisting of four cameras, two placed at the front and two at the back of the specimen, has been developed to measure the cross-sectional area at different positions of the sample. The effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed method are verified through a series of tensile tests and are compared with different localized necking detection methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available