4.7 Article

Improved mechanical strength of magnesium oxysulfate cement using ferric sulfate

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106007

Keywords

Magnesium oxysulfate cement; Ferric sulfate; Hydration; Fe-containing amorphous phase; Mechanical strength; Microstructure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research investigated the impact of ferric sulfate addition on the mechanical strength of magnesium oxysulfate (MOS) cement. Variations in fluidity, setting time, hydration reaction, volume stability, water resistance, phase composition, and microstructure of MOS cement were reported. The results show that the addition of ferric sulfate improved the mechanical strength and water resistance of MOS cement by accelerating the dissolution of MgO and promoting the growth of certain components.
This research investigated the impact of ferric sulfate addition on the mechanical strength of magnesium oxysulfate (MOS) cement. Variations in the fluidity, setting time, hydration reaction, volume stability, water resistance, phase composition, and microstructure of MOS cement were reported. The results show that the addition of ferric sulfate accelerated the dissolution of MgO through reacting with OH to form Fe(OH) 3 gel and promoting the growth of 3 Mg(OH) (2)center dot MgSO4 center dot 8H(2)O, which reduced the fluidity and shortened the setting time of MOS cement. Although the growth time for 5 Mg(OH)(2)center dot MgSO4 center dot 7H(2)O was extended after adding ferric sulfate, the content and crystallinity of 5 Mg(OH)(2)center dot MgSO4 center dot 7H(2)O were increased, improving the mechanical strength and volume stability of MOS cement. The formation of Fe(OH)(3) gel in MOS cement densified the matrix and optimized the pore structure, which can further enhance the mechanical strength and water resistance of MOS cement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available