Journal
DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040667
Keywords
radiotherapy treatment planning; artificial intelligence; quality assurance
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper discusses various aspects of assessing the clinical acceptability of AI-based tools for contouring and treatment planning in radiotherapy, and explores how to establish a standard for defining the clinical acceptability of new autocontouring and planning tools.
Developers and users of artificial-intelligence-based tools for automatic contouring and treatment planning in radiotherapy are expected to assess clinical acceptability of these tools. However, what is 'clinical acceptability'? Quantitative and qualitative approaches have been used to assess this ill-defined concept, all of which have advantages and disadvantages or limitations. The approach chosen may depend on the goal of the study as well as on available resources. In this paper, we discuss various aspects of 'clinical acceptability' and how they can move us toward a standard for defining clinical acceptability of new autocontouring and planning tools.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available