4.6 Review

The Significance of Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Examination in Cushing's Syndrome-A Systematic Review

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13091576

Keywords

dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Cushing's syndrome; BMD-bone mineral density; VFA-vertebral fracture assessment; ALMI-appendicular lean mass index; FMI-fat mass index; AG-android-gynoid ratio; VAT visceral fat

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, the usefulness of DXA in assessing adipose and lean tissue, bone mineral density, and fracture risk has been confirmed. DXA tests offer a quick and reliable analysis of body composition changes. The article discusses different DXA scans and their clinical significance in Cushing's syndrome.
In recent years, the usefulness of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a valuable complementary method of assessing the content and distribution of adipose and lean tissue as well as bone mineral density and estimating the risk of fractures has been increasingly confirmed. The diagnosis and treatment of Cushing's syndrome remain challenging, and monitoring the effects of treatment is often necessary. DXA tests offer a potential solution to many problems related to the availability of a quick, detailed, and reliable analysis of changes in the content and distribution of individual body composition components. The article discusses total body DXA scans (FMI, VAT, ALMI), lumbar spine scans (VFA, TBS), and osteoporosis scans (BMD, T-score, Z-score)-all are of potential interest in Cushing's syndrome. The article discusses the use of the most important indicators obtained from a DXA test (FMI, VAT, ALMI, BMD, T-score, Z-score, VFA, TBS) and their clinical significance in Cushing's syndrome was verified. The literature from the last decade was used for the study, available in MEDLINE, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available