4.6 Article

Study on Pyrolysis of Shale Gas Oil-Based Drilling Cuttings: Kinetics, Process Parameters, and Product Yield

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 8, Issue 15, Pages 13593-13604

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07379

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main reaction range (350-550 degrees C) of oil-based drilling cutting (OBDC) pyrolysis was investigated, and the activation energies were calculated using four different model-free methods. The reaction mechanism was predicted by the Criado method. The study found that residence time, thickness, and heating rate had significant effects on the properties of the pyrolysis products, and the recycled mineral oil can be used to reconfigure oil-based mud (OBM).
The main reaction range (350-550 degrees C) of oil-based drilling cutting (OBDC) pyrolysis was studied by a thermogravimetric analyzer and a vacuum tube furnace. The average activation energies calculated by four model-free methods were 185.5 kJ/mol (FM), 184.16 kJ/mol (FWO), 166.17 kJ/mol (KAS), and 176.03 kJ/mol (Starink). The reaction mechanism was predicted by the Criado (Z-master plot) method. It is found that a high heating rate is helpful to predict the reaction mechanism, but it cannot be described by a single reaction model. Under the conditions of target temperature higher than 350 degrees C, residence time higher than 50 min, laying thickness less than 20 mm, and heating rate lower than 15 degrees C, the residual oil content is lower than 0.3% and the recovery rate of mineral oil is higher than 98.43%. Solid phase products accounted for more than 70%, reached the maximum 17.04% at 450 degrees C, and then decreased to 15.87% at 500 degrees C. Aromatic hydrocarbons, as coking precursors, are transformed from a low ring to a high ring. Recycled mineral oil can reconfigure oil-based mud (OBM). The research results can provide a theoretical basis for process optimization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available