4.7 Article

Morpho-Physiological Evaluation of Solanum betaceum Cav. In Vitro Cloned Plants: A Comparison of Different Micropropagation Methods

Journal

PLANTS-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants12091884

Keywords

axillary shoot proliferation; organogenesis; plant physiology; somatic embryogenesis; tamarillo

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tamarillo is a subtropical solanaceous tree with nutritious edible fruits. Micropropagation by axillary shoot proliferation in a semi-solid medium has been found to be highly efficient for large-scale cloning of selected germplasm.
Tamarillo (Solanum betaceum Cav.) is a subtropical solanaceous tree with increasing agronomic interest due to its nutritious edible fruits. Growing demand for tamarillo plants and fruits requires optimization of existing propagation methods and scaled-up systems for large-scale cloning of selected germplasm. Three in vitro protocols have been used to micropropagate tamarillo: (1) axillary shoot proliferation in a semisolid medium, (2) organogenesis, and (3) somatic embryogenesis procedures. Variables such as the age of the established shoot cultures and rooting treatments were also analyzed. The morphological and physiological quality of acclimatized plants derived from all the methodologies were compared, with seed-derived plants used as a control group. Overall, the results show that in vitro-derived plants have a similar development to seed-derived plants. Micropropagation by axillary shoot proliferation was highly efficient, with rooting rates above 80% in most treatments. Organogenesis induction was more effective from lamina explants using MS media with 2.0 mg center dot L-1 6-benzylaminopurine. Both organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis-derived plants were also morphologically and physiologically equivalent to seed and axillary shoot-derived plants. The specificities of each micropropagation method are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available