4.7 Article

Investigation of the Copper Requirements of the Metallophyte Liverworts Cephaloziella nicholsonii Douin and C. massalongoi (Spruce) Mull.Frib

Journal

PLANTS-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants12122265

Keywords

liverwort; metallophyte; in vitro cultivation; heavy metals; conservation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Former mine sites can serve as habitats for rare specialised bryophyte species adapted to metal-rich conditions. This study explored the growth and reproduction of Cephaloziella nicholsonii and C. massalongoi in copper-contaminated environments. The results suggest that elevated copper is not necessary for optimal growth, and population variation in response to copper treatment may be influenced by ecotypic differences. The taxonomic classification of the Cephaloziella genus is also called for, and implications for species conservation are discussed.
Former mine sites can provide habitat for many rare specialised bryophyte species that have adapted to metal-rich soil conditions that are toxic to most other plant species. Some of the bryophyte species found in this habitat are facultative metallophytes, and others are regarded as strict metallophytes, the so-called 'copper mosses'. It is a general assumption in the literature that Cephaloziella nicholsonii and C. massalongoi, both categorised as Endangered in the IUCN Red List for Europe, are also strict metallophytes and obligate copper bryophytes. This in vitro experiment investigated the growth and gemma production of these two species from different sites in Ireland and Britain on treatment plates of 0 ppm, 3 ppm, 6 ppm, 12 ppm, 24 ppm, 48 ppm and 96 ppm copper. Results show that elevated copper is not an obligate requirement for optimum growth. Differences in response to the copper treatment levels among populations evident within both species could possibly be due to ecotypic variation. A case is also made for the taxonomic revision of the Cephaloziella genus. Implications for the species' conservation are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available