4.7 Article

First Report on Development of Genome-Wide Microsatellite Markers for Stock (Matthiola incana L.)

Journal

PLANTS-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants12040748

Keywords

Matthiola incana; SSR; molecular makers; genetic diversity; genome sequencing

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Potential SSR molecular markers were successfully developed for 40 Matthiola incana varieties using whole genome analysis, providing an important genetic tool for theoretical and applied research on M. incana.
Stock (Matthiola incana (L.) R. Br.) is a famous annual ornamental plant with important ornamental and economic value. The lack of DNA molecular markers has limited genetic analysis, genome evolution, and marker-assisted selective breeding studies of M. incana. Therefore, more DNA markers are needed to support the further elucidation of the biology and genetics of M. incana. In this study, a high-quality genome of M. incana was initially assembled and a set of effective SSR primers was developed at the whole-genome level using genome data. A total of 45,612 loci of SSRs were identified; the di-nucleotide motifs were the most abundant (77.35%). In total, 43,540 primer pairs were designed, of which 300 were randomly selected for PCR validation, and as the success rate for amplification. In addition, 22 polymorphic SSR markers were used to analyze the genetic diversity of 40 stock varieties. Clustering analysis showed that all varieties could be divided into two clusters with a genetic distance of 0.68, which were highly consistent with their flower shape (potted or cut type). Moreover, we have verified that these SSR markers are effective and transferable within the Brassicaceae family. In this study, potential SSR molecular markers were successfully developed for 40 M. incana varieties using whole genome analysis, providing an important genetic tool for theoretical and applied research on M. incana.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available