4.6 Article

Decision-making criteria for pesticide spraying considering the bees' presence on crops to reduce their exposure risk

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1062441

Keywords

bees; pesticides; pollination; regulation; beekeeping; pollinators

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The risk of poisoning bees by sprayed pesticides depends on various factors. To protect bees, farmers can spray insecticides or acaricides on blooming flowers when no bees are foraging, but the criteria for assessing the absence of bees remain unclear. This review analyzes environmental factors and weather conditions affecting the presence of bees on flowering crops, and suggests that nocturnal sprays of pesticides would be the most effective method to avoid unintentional acute poisoning of bees.
The risk of poisoning bees by sprayed pesticides depends on the attractiveness of plants and environmental and climatic factors. Thus, to protect bees from pesticide intoxication, an usual exemption to pesticide regulations allows for spraying on blooming flowers with insecticides or acaricides when no bees are foraging on crops. Nevertheless, decision-making criteria for farmers to assess the absence of bees on their crops remain under debate. To fill this gap, we present here a review of the literature and an analysis of weather conditions and environmental factors that affect the presence of bees on flowering crops that may be treated with pesticides, with the objective of proposing to farmers a series of decision-making criteria on how and when to treat. We conclude that the criteria commonly considered, such as ambient temperature, crop attractiveness, or distance from field edges, cannot guarantee the absence of forager exposure during pesticide sprays. Nocturnal sprays of pesticides on crops would be the most effective action to help farmers avoid unintentional acute poisoning of bees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available