4.5 Article

Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery with a Layered Peel Strategy for Cushing's Disease Treatment: A Case Series

Journal

BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13040671

Keywords

Cushing's disease; endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery; outcomes; pituitary adenoma

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with Cushing's disease (CD) who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETS) with a layered peel strategy. The study found a low rate of surgical complications postoperatively and no recurrence events during follow-up. However, further studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness and safety of this approach due to the limited number of cases.
Patients with Cushing's disease (CD) who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETS) with a layered peel strategy at our center were retrospectively analyzed. Records on patients' basic characteristics, preoperative and early postoperative evaluations, perioperative complications, and follow-up were collected. A total of 12 unselected, consecutive patients with CD were identified. Ten of the twelve patients were female. All tumors were confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging, with a maximum tumor diameter ranging from 5 mm to 11 mm. A lower rate of surgical complications was identified postoperatively, with no cases of carotid artery injury, epistaxis, hematoma, visual disturbance, or intracranial infection, but with one case of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Ten patients experienced immediate remission, and two had delayed remission. No recurrence events were observed during a median follow-up of 51 months. In conclusion, our preliminary experience indicated that ETS with a layered peel strategy provided a perfect remission rate, low complication rate, and no recurrence in a case series of CD patients. Given the limited number of cases, future studies are warranted to confirm its effectiveness and safety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available