4.6 Article

Understanding the delayed Amundsen Sea low response to ENSO

Journal

FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2023.1136025

Keywords

ENSO teleconnection; the Amundsen Sea low (ASL); delayed impact of the ENSO; rossby wave propagation; kinetic energy conversion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the formation process and mechanism of the El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO)-driven teleconnection in West Antarctica are investigated. It is found that the delay in the ENSO effect on West Antarctica is due to the strongest Amundsen Sea Low (ASL) anomaly occurring in May. The configuration of the basic state is crucial for the teleconnection to reach West Antarctica in response to the ENSO.
Although the El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) affects West Antarctica via teleconnection, it is delayed by a season, because the Amundsen Sea Low (ASL) anomaly in response to the ENSO is the strongest in May. However, the process and mechanism of the delay has not been fully elucidated yet. In this study, we examined the formation of the ENSO-driven teleconnection in each month from January to May by analyzing the kinetic energy conversion and Rossby wave propagation. The flow perturbed by the ENSO gains energy from the basic state by energy conversion, but the perturbation does not reach the high latitudes until April. In May, although the ENSO intensity becomes weak, the development of the subtropical jet induces waves to propagate further south, resulting in the anticyclonic circulation anomaly over the ASL region. Numerical experiments that account for the decay of the ENSO forcing and the monthly varying basic state also indicate that the formation of the teleconnection is the strongest in May. The results reveal that the configuration of the basic state is crucial for the teleconnection in response to the ENSO to reach West Antarctica.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available