4.7 Article

Does Preferred Information Format Affect Consumers' Willingness to Pay: A Case Study of Orange Juice Produced by Biotechnology

Journal

FOODS
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods12112130

Keywords

preferred information format; willingness to pay; genetically modified organisms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

People pay more attention to personalized messages and actively process them, which helps stimulate behavioral changes. However, research on the impact of preferred information formats, such as written, infographic, and video, on food production is lacking. A study on consumers' preferences in this area showed that consumers mostly preferred written information, and receiving information in video format improved consumers' trust in food biotechnology. However, the preferred information format did not significantly change consumers' willingness to pay for genetically engineered orange juice.
People who received a more personally relevant message were motivated to pay closer attention to the information and actively process it, which ultimately may stimulate behavioral changes. Therefore, preferred information content has been used in many disciplines to promote effective communication. However, no study has explored the impact of preferred information formats (e.g., word, infographic, and video) concerning food production. With the increasing application of biotechnology to food production, a complex topic to communicate, and evidence that consumers were willing to pay less for bioengineered foods, efficient communication was important to impact consumer preferences. The results of this study showed that consumers mostly preferred information format is writing. Providing information in video format did improve consumers' trust in information about food biotechnology. However, receiving information in consumers' preferred formats did not significantly change consumers' WTP for genetically engineered orange juice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available