4.6 Article

Chromosomal abnormalities and structural defects in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency at a Chinese tertiary medical center

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1158554

Keywords

increased NT; cut-off; chromosomal abnormalities; structural defects; Chinese population

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective study examined the pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with increased NT thickness (>=95th centile) at 11-14 weeks of gestation between January 2020 and November 2020. The results showed that increased NT was associated with a higher risk of chromosomal abnormalities and structural defects. Chromosomal abnormalities and structural defects were more likely to be detected when NT thickness was between the 95th centile and 2.5 mm.
ObjectivesTo explore the pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with increased NT thickness. MethodsThis was a retrospective study of fetuses with increased NT (>= 95th centile) at 11-14 weeks of gestation between January 2020 and November 2020. ResultsAmong 264 fetuses with increased NT, the median of CRL and NT was 61.2 mm and 2.41 mm. Among them, 132 pregnancy women chose invasive prenatal diagnosis (43 cases of chorionic villus sampling (CVS), 89 cases of amniocentesis). Eventually, 16 cases of chromosomal abnormalities were discovered, including 6 cases (6.4%) of trisomy 21, 4 cases (3%) of trisomy 18, 1 case (0.8%) of 45, XO, 1 case (0.8%) of 47, XXY and 4 cases (3.03%) of CNV abnormalities. The major structural defects included hydrops (6.4%), cardiac defects (3%), and urinary anomalies (2.7%). The incidences of chromosomal abnormalities and structural defects in the NT < 2.5 mm group were 1.3 and 6%, while the incidences were 8.8 and 28.9% in the NT >= 2.5 group. ConclusionIncreased NT was associated with high risk of chromosomal abnormalities and structural anomalies. Chromosomal abnormalities and structural defects could be detected when NT thickness was between 95th centile and 2.5 mm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available