4.6 Review

Diagnosis and treatment of infectious vaginitis: Proposal for a new algorithm

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1040072

Keywords

Vaginitis; bacterial vaginosis; Genital infection; Candidiasis; trichomoniasis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Brazilian Group for Vaginal Infections (GBIV) aimed to improve gynecological practice by developing practical algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of vaginitis. These algorithms consider different scenarios and diagnostic tools, emphasizing the importance of medical history, gynecological examination, and complementary tests.
BackgroundVaginitis is the most common gynecologic diagnosis in primary care, and most women have at least one episode during their lives. The need for standardized strategies to diagnose and treat vaginitis, both in primary care and among gynecologists, is emphasized. The Brazilian Group for Vaginal Infections (GBIV, acronym in Portuguese) aimed to update the practical approach to affected women by reviewing and discussing recent literature, and developing algorithms for diagnosis and treatment of vaginitis. MethodsA literature search within biomedical databases PubMed and SCieLo was conducted in January 2022. The available literature was evaluated by three experienced researchers, members of the GBIV, to summarize the main data and develop practical algorithms. Results and conclusionDetailed algorithms were developed with the main goal to improve gynecological practice considering different scenarios and access to diagnostic tools, from the simplest to the most complex tests. Different age groups and specific contexts were also considered. The combination of anamnesis, gynecological examination, and complementary tests remains the basis of a proper diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Periodic updates of these algorithms are warranted as new evidence becomes available.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available