4.3 Article

Biallelic loss of CDKN2A is associated with poor response to treatment in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Journal

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 1162-1171

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1228925

Keywords

Childhood BCP-ALL; microdeletions; MLPA; MRD; 9p21 chromosomal region; prognostic factors

Funding

  1. National Science Centre [10.13039/501100004281 [N407 2725 39]]
  2. Polpharma Scientific Foundation [4/19/IX/1]
  3. Foundation for Polish Science [10.13039/501100001870]
  4. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [DI2012010142, DI2012017042]
  5. National Center of Research and Development [LIDER 031/635/l-5/13/NCBR/2014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The inactivation of tumor suppressor genes located within 9p21 locus (CDKN2A, CDKN2B) occurs in up to 30% of children with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL), but its independent prognostic significance remains controversial. In order to investigate the prognostic impact of deletions and promoter methylation within 9p21, 641 children with newly diagnosed BCP-ALL using methylation specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) were investigated. A total of 169 (26.4%) microdeletions in 9p21 were detected, of which 71 were homozygous. Patients with CDKN2A homozygous deletions were older at diagnosis (p < .001), more frequently steroid resistant (p = .049), had higher WBC count (p < .001), higher MRD at Day 15 (p = .013) and lower relapse-free survival [p = .028, hazard ratio: 2.28 (95% confidence interval: 1.09-4.76)] than patients without these alterations. CDKN2A homozygous deletions coexisted with IKZF1 and PAX5 deletions (p < .001). In conclusion, CDKN2A homozygous deletions, but not promoter methylation, are associated with poor response to treatment and increased relapse risk of pediatric BCP-ALL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available