4.6 Article

Comparative analysis of insulated floating cover of water pit thermal energy storage

Journal

ENERGY REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 644-652

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.071

Keywords

Seasonal heat storage; Composite IFC; Finite element model; Lumped thermal system model; Transient heat transfer

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper establishes a one-dimensional finite element model and a zero-dimensional lumped thermal system model to study the effect of the insulated floating cover (IFC) on thermal storage efficiency in water pits, and compares the model results with experiments. The results show that the lumped thermal system model can accurately describe the transient heat transfer process of the composite IFC if the model is sufficiently refined. The results of the lumped thermal system model and the finite element model are in good agreement with 99.2% and differ by about 2.6% from the experimental results.
Water pit thermal energy storage (PTES) as a sensible heat storage technology has been applied in many places with significant success. The insulated floating cover (IFC) of water pit is the key component of the PTES thermal storage efficiency and accounts for more than half of the total cost of the entire water pit. In this paper, a one-dimensional finite element model (1D FEM) and a zero-dimensional lumped thermal system model (0D LTSM) are established for the composite IFC of PTES, and their respective results are compared with experiments respectively. LTSM results match the FEM resolution results if the LTSM is sufficiently refined by discretized each layer into several sub-systems with their own mass and thermal resistance. In this LTSM, 5 sub-systems are used in the thermal insulation layer, and 2 sub-systems are used in the upper and lower impervious barrier respectively. The results show that the LTSM can accurately describe the transient heat transfer process of the composite IFC. The results of LTSM and FEM are in good agreement with 99.2%, which is about 2.6% different from the experimental results. (c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available