4.6 Article

Circulation of SARS-CoV-Related Coronaviruses and Alphacoronaviruses in Bats from Croatia

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11040959

Keywords

SARS-CoV; bat; sarbecovirus; RT-qPCR; NGS; sVNT

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bats in Croatia are found to have the circulation of SARS-CoV-related coronaviruses. Guano samples tested positive for E-gene Sarebeco RT-qPCR, while bat droppings were negative. Further analysis revealed the presence of bat alphacoronaviruses and betacoronaviruses. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed the clustering of betaCoV sequence with SARS-CoV-related bat sarbecoviruses. The results indicate the first evidence of these coronaviruses in bats from Croatia.
Bats are natural hosts of various coronaviruses (CoVs), including human CoVs, via an assumed direct zoonotic spillover or intermediate animal host. The present study aimed to investigate the circulation of CoVs in a bat colony in the Mediterranean region of Croatia. Guano and individual droppings from four bat species were sampled and tested with the E-gene sarbecovirus RT-qPCR, the pan-CoV semi-nested RT-PCR targeting the RdRp gene and NGS. Furthermore, bat blood samples were investigated for the presence of sarbecovirus-specific antibodies with the surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT). The initial testing showed E-gene Sarebeco RT-qPCR reactivity in 26% of guano samples while the bat droppings tested negative. The application of RdRp semi-nested RT-PCR and NGS revealed the circulation of bat alpha- and betaCoVs. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed the clustering of betaCoV sequence with SARS-CoV-related bat sarbecoviruses and alpha-CoV sequences with representatives of the Minunacovirus subgenus. The results of sVNT show that 29% of bat sera originated from all four species that tested positive. Our results are the first evidence of the circulation of SARS-CoV-related coronaviruses in bats from Croatia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available