4.7 Review

Antioxidant Supplementation on Male Fertility-A Systematic Review

Journal

ANTIOXIDANTS
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox12040836

Keywords

antioxidant; male fertility; supplementation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this review was to evaluate the effect of antioxidant supplementation (AS) on male fertility parameters. Numerous studies have shown a positive impact of AS on assisted reproductive therapy outcomes, semen parameters, and live birth rate. However, there is still a need for further research to determine the optimal combination of antioxidants and the influence of environmental factors.
Our aim was to review the current literature regarding the effect of antioxidant supplementation (AS) on male fertility parameters, as AS is commonly used to treat male infertility due to the availability and affordability of antioxidants in many parts of the world. Materials and methods: PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane electronic bibliographies were searched using the modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to evaluate studies on the benefit of antioxidant therapy on infertile men. Results were analyzed regarding the following aspects: (a) ingredient and dose; (b) potential mechanism of action and rationale for use; and (c) effect on various reported outcomes. Results: Thus, 29 studies found a substantial positive effect of AS on outcomes of assisted reproductive therapy (ART), WHO semen parameters, and live-birth rate. Carnitines, Vitamin E and C, N-acetyl cysteine, coenzyme Q10, selenium, zinc, folic acid, and lycopene were beneficial ingredients. Nevertheless, some studies did not show a substantial change in one or more factors. Conclusion: AS seems to have a positive effect on male fertility. Environmental factors may play an increasing role in fertility. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal AS combination and the influence of environmental factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available