4.7 Article

Agomelatine, a Melatonin-Derived Drug, as a New Strategy for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer

Journal

ANTIOXIDANTS
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox12040926

Keywords

agomelatine; melatonin; p53; circadian clock; colorectal cancer; SIRT1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The potential use of agomelatine as an alternative treatment for colorectal cancer is evaluated in this study. In vitro and in vivo models were used to study the effects of agomelatine on cell lines with different p53 statuses. Both agomelatine and melatonin showed inhibitory effects on the cells, with agomelatine being more effective. Agomelatine also regulated more clock genes and demonstrated a greater oncostatic effect in colorectal cancer.
The potential use of agomelatine as an alternative treatment for colorectal cancer is evaluated in this work. The effect of agomelatine was studied in an in vitro model using two cell lines with different p53 statuses (HCT-116, wild-type p53, and HCT-116 p53 null) and an in vivo xenograft model. The inhibitory effects of agomelatine and melatonin were stronger in the cells harboring the wild-type p53, although in both cell lines, the effect of agomelatine was greater than that of the melatonin. In vivo, only agomelatine was able to reduce the volumes of tumors generated by the HCT-116-p53-null cells. Both treatments induced changes in the rhythmicity of the circadian-clock genes in vitro, albeit with some differences. Agomelatine and melatonin regulated the rhythmicity of Per1-3, Cry1, Sirt1, and Prx1 in the HCT-116 cells. In these cells, agomelatine also regulated Bmal1 and Nr1d2, while melatonin changed the rhythmicity of Clock. In the HCT-116-p53-null cells, agomelatine regulated Per1-3, Cry1, Clock, Nr1d2, Sirt1, and Prx1; however, melatonin only induced changes in Clock, Bmal1, and Sirt1. The differences found in the regulation of the clock genes may explain the greater oncostatic effect of agomelatine in CRC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available