4.7 Review

Circulating microRNAs for Early Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

BIOMOLECULES
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom13050871

Keywords

microRNA; ovarian cancer; biomarker; diagnostics; meta-analysis; systematic review; miR-21; miR-205; miR-106; miR-328; miR-26; miR-141; miR-200c; miR-200b; miR-429

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the global research potential of different circulating miRNAs as an early diagnostic biomarker for ovarian cancer (OC). The primary search resulted in 1887 articles, and 44 relevant studies were identified. Nine miRNAs were found to be dysregulated in OC patients compared to controls, with miR-21, -125, -141, -145, -205, -328, -200a, -200b, and -200c being upregulated. Future studies of circulating miRNAs in relation to OC should consider factors such as sample size, consensus guidelines, and coverage of previously reported miRNAs.
In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize and evaluate the global research potential of different circulating miRNAs as an early diagnostic biomarker for OC. A systematic literature search for relevant studies was conducted in June 2020 and followed up in November 2021. The search was conducted in English databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect). The primary search resulted in a total of 1887 articles, which were screened according to the prior established inclusion and exclusion criteria. We identified 44 relevant studies, of which 22 were eligible for the quantitative meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the Meta-package in Rstudio. Standardized mean differences (SMD) of relative levels between control subjects and OC patients were used to evaluate the differential expression. All studies were quality evaluated using a Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Based on the meta-analysis, nine miRNAs were identified as dysregulated in OC patients compared to controls. Nine were upregulated in OC patients compared to controls (miR-21, -125, -141, -145, -205, -328, -200a, -200b, -200c). Furthermore, miR-26, -93, -106 and -200a were analyzed, but did not present an overall significant difference between OC patients and controls. These observations should be considered when performing future studies of circulating miRNAs in relation to OC: sufficient size of clinical cohorts, development of consensus guidelines for circulating miRNA measurements, and coverage of previously reported miRNAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available