4.7 Article

Development of MVA-d34 Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine: Design and Immunogenicity

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11040831

Keywords

dengue; vaccine; MVA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dengue fever is a global health problem, affecting over 100 million people annually. Vaccination is the most effective prevention strategy, but the development of vaccines is hindered by the risk of antibody-dependent enhancement. This article presents the development of an MVA-d34 vaccine against dengue virus, using safe and effective MVA viral vector. The vaccine targets the DIII domains of the envelope protein, which do not cause enhanced infection. Immunized mice generate a humoral response against all four dengue virus serotypes, and their sera have virus-neutralizing activity against dengue serotype 2. The MVA-d34 vaccine shows promise as a candidate vaccine against dengue fever.
Dengue fever, an infectious disease that affects more than 100 million people every year, is a global health problem. Vaccination may be the most effective prevention strategy for the disease. However, the development of vaccines against dengue fever is complicated by the high risk of developing an antibody-dependent increase in infection. This article describes the development of an MVA-d34 vaccine against the dengue virus based on a safe and effective MVA viral vector. The DIII domains of the envelope protein (E) of the dengue virus are used as vaccine antigens, as antibodies against these domains do not cause an enhancement of infection. The use of the DIII domains of each of the four dengue virus serotypes made it possible to generate a humoral response against all four dengue virus serotypes in immunized mice. We also showed that the sera of vaccinated mice present virus-neutralizing activity against dengue serotype 2. Thus, the developed MVA-d34 vaccine is a promising candidate vaccine against dengue fever.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available