4.7 Article

Weaker Effects of the Fourth Dose of BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine on the Elderly Human Population

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061095

Keywords

vaccination; vulnerable population; SARS-CoV-2; immune monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effectiveness of current vaccines is lower in older people due to aging of their immune systems. A study measured the antibody responses of 42 adults in nursing homes after receiving the third and fourth doses of an mRNA vaccine. The results showed that the strain of the virus influenced the effect of the fourth dose on neutralizing antibodies. The fourth dose increased binding antibodies, but the effect was less significant compared to the third dose. However, the fourth dose provided approximately 80% protection against a SARS-CoV-2 BA.2 infection in most individuals.
The vaccines presently available are less effective in older people due to senescence of their immune systems. We measured the antibody responses of 42 adults living in nursing homes after the third and the fourth doses of an mRNA vaccine and found that the strain (BA.2 and BA.2.75: from 64 to 128, BA.5: from 16 to 32, BQ.1.1: from 16 to 64 among the uninfected) influenced the effect of the fourth dose of vaccine on neutralizing antibodies. The fourth dose also increased binding antibodies (from 1036 BAU/mL to 5371 BAU/mL among the uninfected, from 3700 BAU/mL to 6773 BAU/mL among the BA.5 infected). This effect was less significant than that of the third dose of vaccine for both neutralizing (BA.2: from 8 to 128, BA.5: from 2 to 16, BA.2.75: from 8 to 64, BQ.1.1: from 2 to 16) and binding antibodies (from 139.8 BAU/mL to 2293 BAU/mL). However, the fourth dose attained the 5000 BAU/mL threshold conferring approximately 80% protection against a SARS-CoV-2 BA.2 infection in most individuals, unlike the third.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available