4.7 Article

Misinformation about the COVID-19 Vaccine in Online Catholic Media

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061054

Keywords

misinformation; Catholic media; COVID-19 vaccine; fake news; infodemic; health communication; vaccination; news media; digital media

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research analyzes publications about the COVID-19 vaccine in Catholic online media. The results show that most publications are informative with neutral headlines, but opinion articles have negative headlines. Many opinion authors and sources cited are from the religious sphere. Additionally, 35% of the publications relate the vaccine to the issue of abortion.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, online media were the most widely used sources of scientific information. Often, they are also the only ones on science-related topics. Research has shown that much of the information available on the Internet about the health crisis lacked scientific rigor, and that misinformation about health issues can pose a threat to public health. In turn, millions of Catholics were found to be demonstrating against vaccination against COVID-19 based on false and misleading religious arguments. This research analyses publications about the vaccine in Catholic online media with the aim of understanding the presence of information (and misinformation) in this community. An algorithm designed for each media outlet collected COVID-19 vaccine-related publications from 109 Catholic media outlets in five languages. In total, 970 publications were analysed for journalistic genres, types of headlines and sources of information. The results show that most publications are informative and most of their headlines are neutral. However, opinion articles have mostly negative headlines. Furthermore, a higher percentage of the opinion authors come from the religious sphere and most of the sources cited are religious. Finally, 35% of the publications relate the vaccine to the framing issue of abortion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available