4.7 Article

Acute myeloid leukemia derived from lympho-myeloid clonal hematopoiesis

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 1286-1295

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.345

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Braukmann-Wittenberg-Herz-Stiftung
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01EO0802]
  4. Deutsche Krebshilfe [110284, 110287, 110292, 111267]
  5. Deutsche Jose Carreras Leukamie-Stiftung e.V [DJCLS R13/14]
  6. DFG [HE 5240/5-1, HE 5240/6-1, BU 1339/8-1]
  7. ERC grant under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [638035]
  8. Dieter-Schlag Stiftung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with lympho-myeloid clonal hematopoiesis (LM-CH), defined by the presence of DNA methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) mutations in both the myeloid and lymphoid T-cell compartment. Diagnostic, complete remission (CR) and relapse samples were sequenced for 34 leukemia-related genes in 171 DNMT3A mutated adult AML patients. AML with LM-CH was found in 40 patients (23%) and was associated with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential years before AML, older age, secondary AML and more frequent MDS-type co-mutations (TET2, RUNX1 and EZH2). In 82% of AML patients with LM-CH, the preleukemic clone was refractory to chemotherapy and was the founding clone for relapse. Both LM-CH and non-LM-CH MRD-positive AML patients who achieved CR had a high risk of relapse after 10 years (75% and 75%, respectively) compared with patients without clonal hematopoiesis in CR with negative MRD (27% relapse rate). Long-term survival of patients with LM-CH was only seen after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We define AML patients with LM-CH as a distinct high-risk group of AML patients that can be identified at diagnosis through mutation analysis in T cells and should be considered for HSCT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available