4.7 Review

Testable Candidate Immune Correlates of Protection for Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Vaccination

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11030594

Keywords

vaccination; PRRSV; correlates of protection; humoral immunity; IgG; neutralizing antibodies; T cell; IFN-gamma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PRRSV is a persistent issue in the global pig industry. Although vaccinations show some benefits, the specific immune correlates of protection (CoP) have not been clearly defined. We propose four hypotheses for CoP in PRRSV research, which can guide future vaccine design and evaluation.
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is an on-going problem for the worldwide pig industry. Commercial and experimental vaccinations often demonstrate reduced pathology and improved growth performance; however, specific immune correlates of protection (CoP) for PRRSV vaccination have not been quantified or even definitively postulated: proposing CoP for evaluation during vaccination and challenge studies will benefit our collective efforts towards achieving protective immunity. Applying the breadth of work on human diseases and CoP to PRRSV research, we advocate four hypotheses for peer review and evaluation as appropriate testable CoP: (i) effective class-switching to systemic IgG and mucosal IgA neutralizing antibodies is required for protective immunity; (ii) vaccination should induce virus-specific peripheral blood CD4(+) T-cell proliferation and IFN-? production with central memory and effector memory phenotypes; cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL) proliferation and IFN-? production with a CCR7(-) phenotype that should migrate to the lung; (iii) nursery, finishing, and adult pigs will have different CoP; (iv) neutralizing antibodies provide protection and are rather strain specific; T cells confer disease prevention/reduction and possess greater heterologous recognition. We believe proposing these four CoP for PRRSV can direct future vaccine design and improve vaccine candidate evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available