4.5 Review

Noninvasive respiratory support after extubation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW
Volume 32, Issue 168, Pages -

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0196-2022

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the effects of noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) on post-extubation respiratory failure and found that NRS reduced re-intubations and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) but increased discomfort. Prophylactic NRS did not prevent extubation failure in low-risk or hypoxaemic patients.
Background The effect of noninvasive respiratory support (NRS), including high-flow nasal oxygen, bilevel positive airway pressure and continuous positive airway pressure (noninvasive ventilation (NIV)), for preventing and treating post-extubation respiratory failure is still unclear. Our objective was to assess the effects of NRS on post-extubation respiratory failure, defined as re-intubation secondary to post-extubation respiratory failure (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), discomfort, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and time to re-intubation. Subgroup analyses considered prophylactic versus therapeutic NRS application and subpopulations (high-risk, low-risk, post-surgical and hypoxaemic patients). Methods We undertook a systematic review and network meta-analysis (Research Registry: reviewregistry1435). PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus and Web of Science were searched (from inception until 22 June 2022). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of NRS after extubation in ICU adult patients were included. Results 32 RCTs entered the quantitative analysis (5063 patients). Compared with conventional oxygen therapy, NRS overall reduced re-intubations and VAP (moderate certainty). NIV decreased hospital mortality (moderate certainty), and hospital and ICU LOS (low and very low certainty, respectively), and increased discomfort (moderate certainty). Prophylactic NRS did not prevent extubation failure in low-risk or hypoxaemic patients. Conclusion Prophylactic NRS may reduce the rate of post-extubation respiratory failure in ICU patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available