4.7 Review

Emerging therapies provide new opportunities to reshape the multifaceted interactions between the immune system and lymphoma cells

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 30, Issue 9, Pages 1805-1815

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.161

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [10007]
  2. ImmOnc [BIO F.E.S.R. 2007/13, LR 34/2004]
  3. Oncology Program of Compagnia di San Paolo, Torino
  4. Ricerca Finalizzata, Ministero della Salute
  5. Gelu Foundation (Switzerland)
  6. Oncoethix
  7. PIQUR Therapeutics AG
  8. EMD Serono
  9. Bayer AG
  10. Sigma Tau
  11. Italfarmaco
  12. CTI Life Sciences and Celgene

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The acquisition of a complete neoplastic phenotype requires cancer cells to develop escape mechanisms from the host immune system. This phenomenon, commonly referred to as 'immune evasion,' represents a hallmark of cancers and results from a Darwinian selection of the fittest tumor clones. First reported in solid tumors, cancer immunoescape characterizes several hematological malignancies. The biological bases of cancer immunoescape have recently been disclosed and include: (i) impaired human leukocyte antigen-mediated cancer cell recognition (B2M, CD58, CTIIA, CD80/CD86, CD28 and CTLA-4 mutations); (ii) deranged apoptotic mechanisms (reduced pro-apoptotic signals and/or increased expression of anti-apoptotic molecules); and (iii) changes in the tumor microenvironment involving regulatory T cells and tumor-associated macrophages. These immune-escape mechanisms characterize both Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin (B and T cell) lymphomas and represent a promising target for new anti-tumor therapies. In the present review, the principles of cancer immunoescape and their role in human lymphomagenesis are illustrated. Current therapies targeting these pathways and possible applications for lymphoma treatment are also addressed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available