4.7 Editorial Material

'Big team' science challenges us to reconsider authorship

Journal

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages 665-667

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01572-2

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

'Big team' science challenges researchers to reconsider authorship issues including defining authorship-worthy contributions, documenting contributions, and handling disagreements among coauthors. We propose steps to resolve these issues.
'Big team' science challenges researchers to revisit three issues around authorship: (1) how to define authorship-worthy contributions, (2) how contributions should be documented and (3) how disagreements among large teams of coauthors should be handled. We propose steps that the community can take to resolve these issues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available