4.6 Article

Semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-related cirrhosis: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial

Journal

LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 511-522

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00068-7

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The efficacy and safety of the glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue semaglutide in patients with NASH and compensated cirrhosis were investigated in this study. The results showed that semaglutide did not significantly improve fibrosis or achieve NASH resolution. The importance of this study lies in providing insights into the effects of this medication in NASH and compensated cirrhosis.
Background Patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related cirrhosis are at high risk of liver-related and all-cause morbidity and mortality. We investigated the efficacy and safety of the glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue semaglutide in patients with NASH and compensated cirrhosis.Methods This double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial enrolled patients from 38 centres in Europe and the USA. Adults with biopsy-confirmed NASH-related cirrhosis and body-mass index (BMI) of 27 kg/m2 or more were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg or visually matching placebo. Patients were randomly allocated via an interactive web response system, stratified by presence or absence of type 2 diabetes. Patients, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an improvement in liver fibrosis of one stage or more without worsening of NASH after 48 weeks, assessed by biopsy in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The trial is closed and completed, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03987451.Findings 71 patients were enrolled between June 18, 2019, and April 22, 2021; 49 (69%) patients were female and 22 (31%) were male. Patients had a mean age of 59.5 years (SD 8.0) and mean BMI of 34.9 kg/m2 (SD 5.9); 53 (75%) patients had diabetes. 47 patients were randomly assigned to the semaglutide group and 24 to the placebo group. After 48 weeks, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the proportion of patients with an improvement in liver fibrosis of one stage or more without worsening of NASH (five [11%] of 47 patients in the semaglutide group vs seven [29%] of 24 in the placebo group; odds ratio 0.28 [95% CI 0.06-1.24; p=0.087). There was also no significant difference between groups in the proportion of patients who achieved NASH resolution (p=0.29). Similar proportions of patients in each group reported adverse events (42 [89%] patients in the semaglutide group vs 19 [79%] in the placebo group) and serious adverse events (six [13%] vs two [8%]). The most common adverse events were nausea (21 [45%] vs four [17%]), diarrhoea (nine [19%] vs two [8%]), and vomiting (eight [17%] vs none). Hepatic and renal function remained stable. There were no decompensating events or deaths.Interpretation In patients with NASH and compensated cirrhosis, semaglutide did not significantly improve fibrosis or achievement of NASH resolution versus placebo. No new safety concerns were raised.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available