4.1 Article

Development and validation of an automated assay for anti-drug-antibodies in rat serum

Journal

SLAS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 361-368

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.slast.2023.04.001

Keywords

Anti-drug antibodies (ADA); BioMek; Bridging ELISA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed automated screening and confirmatory assays for the detection of rat antibodies against a specific humanized antibody. The assays were evaluated and found to be suitable for purpose. The assays were then used to evaluate the levels of antibodies in rat serum after administration of different doses of lipid-nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA.
The potential immunogenicity of therapeutic human and humanized monoclonal antibodies (mAb) is a significant concern, and so preclinical testing of therapeutic mAbs routinely includes assessment of anti-drug antibody (ADA) induction. Here, we report the development of automated screening and confirmatory bridging ELISAs for the detection of rat antibodies against DH1042, an engineered human mAb for the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain. The assays were evaluated for specificity, sensitivity, selectivity, absence of a prozone effect, linearity, intra-and inter-assay precision, and robustness, and found to be suitable for purpose. The assays were then used to evaluate anti-DH1042 antibodies in the sera of rats dosed with lipid-nanoparticle (LNP)-encapsulated mRNA encoding DH1042. Rats received two doses of 0.1, 0.4 or 0.6 mg/kg/dose LNP-mRNA 8 days apart. Twenty-one days after the second dose, 50-100% of rats had developed confirmed anti-DH1042 ADA depending on dose level. No animals in the control group developed anti-DH1042 ADA. These assays reflect new applications for a non-specialized laboratory automation platform, and the methodologies and approaches reported here provide a template that can be adapted for the automated detection and confirmation of ADA in preclinical testing of other biologics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available