Journal
BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH
Volume 115, Issue 12, Pages 1174-1180Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.2204
Keywords
conjoined twins; craniorachipagus; janiceps; rachipagus
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article describes a previously misdiagnosed case of symmetric craniorachipagus, which was initially identified as janiceps and as pygopagus. By comparing this case with previous ones, the phenotypic features of craniorachipagus were delineated, and the underreporting of rare conditions like this was discussed. However, further investigations are needed to understand the etiopathogenesis and lethality of this condition.
BackgroundSymmetric craniorachipagus is an exceedingly rare type of bi-umbilical conjoined twinning, known from only three scantily described cases. CaseWe identified a fourth, previously described case that was misdiagnosed as janiceps and as pygopagus. It concerned dorsally conjoined twins that were part of a triplet pregnancy, spontaneously born at 22 weeks of gestation. Radiography confirmed union at the occipital craniums and the thoracolumbar vertebral columns. Both twins had their own separate umbilical cords. To delineate the phenotype of craniorachipagus and to differentiate it from rachipagus without cranial involvement, we compared the present case with the previous three reported cases and with the historical literature concerning comparable conditions. Furthermore, we discuss why exceedingly rare conditions such as these are presently underreported in the literature. ConclusionSymmetric craniorachipagus is a type of bi-umbilical conjoined twinning, to date represented by four confirmed cases that share a similar phenotype. This includes dorsal conjunction at the sides of the occipital craniums and the vertebral columns, in the absence of any visceral connections. Details on its etiopathogenesis and apparent lethality await additional case investigations. No unequivocally confirmed cases of symmetric rachipagus without cranial involvement have been reported and its existence in humans has yet to be proven.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available