4.0 Article

Contrasting genetic diversity and strong genetic break between the Chilean and Japanese strains of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella (Dinophyceae) as revealed by newly developed microsatellite markers

Journal

PLANKTON & BENTHOS RESEARCH
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 55-59

Publisher

PLANKTON SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.3800/pbr.18.55

Keywords

Alexandrium catenella; microsatellite; paralytic shellfish poisoning; phytoplankton; toxic dinoflagellate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The toxic dinoflagellate A. catenella poses a threat to seafood security in Chile. Genetic markers were developed to study its spatial and temporal diversity and genetic connectivity.
Outbreaks of paralytic shellfish poisoning caused by the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella (Dinophyceae) are currently a serious global problem both from economic and food hygiene perspectives. In Chile, A. catenella was first recorded in 1972 and is currently the main harmful algae species in the country, in terms of seafood security. As no relevant microsatellite markers for Chilean A. catenella populations were available, we isolated 23 new polymorphic microsatellite loci of A. catenella from Chile, of which 15 are applicable to both Chilean and Japanese populations. We found a strong genetic break between Chilean and Japanese A. catenella populations (FST=0.298, P<0.001), consistent with the morphological differences between them. In contrast to the Japanese population, for which genetic diversity ranged from 0.268 to 0.937, the Chilean population had a lower genetic diversity, ranging between 0.065 and 0.512. This study successfully developed A. catenella microsatellite markers that can be used to investigate its ge-netic spatial and temporal bloom diversity and assess further genetic connectivity between the population from southern and northern Chilean areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available