4.6 Article

Knitting for conservation: a social practice perspective on a social and behaviour change communication intervention

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03066-7

Keywords

Social practice theory; Social and behaviour change communication; Neoliberal conservation; Eco-tourism; Indigenous communities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, we critically reflect on a conservation project in the Ecuadorian Amazon that aimed to promote biodiversity conservation among lowland indigenous communities involved in eco-tourism initiatives. Through interpretive qualitative research and social practice theory, we examine how participants' engagement with new knitting in participatory workshops transformed their understanding of environmental conservation and social entrepreneurship in an eco-tourism context. Ultimately, the intervention led to the adoption of new and unsustainable conservation and entrepreneurial practices, turning animals into commodities and creating a disconnect between local and traditional knowledge.
We critically reflect on a conservation project in the Ecuadorian Amazon that was designed to promote biodiversity conservation among lowland indigenous communities involved in eco-tourism initiatives by teaching them how to knit a particular set of local animals. We use interpretive qualitative research and draw on social practice theory to examine the ways that participants' engagement with new knitting in participatory knitting workshops changed the understanding of environmental conservation and social entrepreneurship within an eco-tourism context. Eventually, the intervention pushed participants to adopt new and difficult-to-sustain conservation and entrepreneurial practices. The introduction of these new practices and a focus on a specific list of local species turned animals into commodities and created unsustainable connections with new materials and a disconnect between local and traditional know-how.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available