4.7 Article

Regulated Deficit Irrigation during Vegetative Growth Enhances Crop Water Productivity in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13030917

Keywords

chickpea; crop evapotranspiration; grain quality; grain yield; phenology; regulated; sustained deficit irrigation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By comparing different irrigation methods, this study found that maintaining 100% ETc during flowering is crucial for chickpea growth, while maintaining 75% ETc during the vegetative growth stage can increase crop water productivity (CWP) and minimize the impact on grain yield.
To optimize irrigation, agronomists need to modulate crop water productivity (CWP) throughout phenology. We compared regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) and sustained deficit irrigation (SDI) in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. var. Blanoro), expecting RDI during vegetative growth (VG) to enhance CWP, as opposed to flowering (F) and pod-filling (PF) stages. The effects of RDI and SDI on grain yield, plant height, weight, grain caliber, pods and grains per plant, harvest index, and CWP, were tested through a complete randomized block experiment during the years 2020 and 2021, comparing full irrigation (FI, ETc = 100%), SDI (SDI75, ETc = 75% during all stages), and six RDI treatments varying in ETc% across phenology: VG(50), VG(75), F-50, F-75, PF50, and PF75. VG(75) had higher CWP while minimizing impacts on productivity. During 2020, the plants were taller (0.44 +/- 4.4 m), and increased in harvest index (0.47 +/- 0.06), and CWP (0.90 +/- 0.2 kg m(-3)) (p < 0.05), while in 2021, plants were heavier (11.4 +/- 2.8 g) and increased in caliber (46.1 +/- 3.0 grains); grain yield did not differ between the years (p > 0.05), reaching 861.8 (2020) and 944.7 kg ha(-1) (2021). Our results highlight the relevance of maintaining 100% ETc during flowering, and the maintenance of RDI at 75% ETc during vegetative growth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available