4.7 Article

Reproductive Performance of Triplet-Bearing Ewes on Commercial Farms and Research Priorities Identified by Sheep Producers to Improve the Survival of Triplet-Bearing Ewes and Their Lambs

Journal

ANIMALS
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ani13071258

Keywords

triplet-bearing ewes; ewe mortality; lamb survival; producer consultation; needs analysis; research priorities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The proportion of triplets among ewes is increasing on sheep farms in Australia due to the use of more fecund genetics and better management practices. A study of sheep producers showed that the mortality rate of triplet-bearing ewes was 6.4%, and the survival rate of triplet-born lambs was 59%. There was variability in the management practices adopted, but no significant differences were found in the mortality rate or lamb survival between different practices. The highest priorities for future research identified by producers were ewe condition score, mob size, feed-on-offer at lambing, and mineral supplementation.
Simple Summary: The proportion of ewes conceiving triplets is increasing on farms across Australia as sheep producers adopt more fecund genetics and ewe management practices to increase lamb output per ewe mated. The aims of this research were to consult producers to quantify rates of ewe and lamb mortality in this cohort and identify priorities for future research to reduce these losses. Surveys of producers with experience in managing triplet-bearing ewes indicated the average mortality of triplet-bearing ewes was 6.4%, and the survival of triplet-born lambs was 59%. There was significant variation in the actual targets adopted by different producers for ewe condition score at lambing, mob size during lambing and feed-on-offer at lambing, and no differences in the average rate of mortality of triplet-bearing ewes or lamb survival between producers that prioritised adoption of certain management practices. The highest priorities for further research identified by producers from surveys, workshops and a webinar were ewe condition score, mob size, feed-on-offer at lambing and mineral supplementation. Consultation with sheep producers was used to quantify the mortality of triplet-bearing ewes and their lambs, identify management practices adopted by producers to reduce these losses and prioritise future research needs to improve the survival of triplet-bearing ewes and their lambs. Surveys were completed by 64 producers across Australia who identified and separated tripletbearing ewes from twin-bearing ewes in 2017 and/or 2018. On average, 5.9% of all ewes mated were identified as carrying triplets (6.6% of non-Merino ewes and 2.9% of Merino ewes). The average mortality of triplet-bearing ewes was 6.4%, and ewe mortality did not differ significantly between ewe breeds. The average survival of triplet-born lambs was 59%, and survival was significantly higher for lambs from non-Merino compared to Merino ewes (60.1 vs. 52.9%, p < 0.05). The key strategies adopted to reduce the mortality of triplet-bearing ewes and their lambs included management of condition score, feed-on-offer, mob size at lambing and use of shelter. There were no differences (p > 0.05) in the average mortality of triplet-bearing ewes or their lambs between producers that prioritised the adoption of certain management practices. However, significant variation existed between producers in their targets at lambing for ewe condition score (2.8 to 3.5), mob size (10 to 150 ewes) and feed-on-offer (800 to 2500 kg dry matter/ha). Overwhelmingly, the highest priorities for further research identified by producers from surveys, workshops and a webinar were ewe condition score, mob size, feed-on-offer at lambing and mineral supplementation. This study informs benchmarks for mortality of triplet-bearing ewes and their lambs under extensive grazing conditions in Australia, and the priorities for future research to reduce these losses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available