4.3 Article

Medication Adherence and Healthcare Costs in Chronically Ill Patients Using German Claims Data

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00797-6

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to overcome methodological limitations in current research on medication adherence and its relationship to healthcare costs. Using different modeling approaches, the study found a positive association between medication adherence and total costs, a weak association with outpatient costs, positive association with pharmacy costs, and frequently negative association with inpatient costs. The study highlights the importance of avoiding concurrent measurement and considering the presence of a non-linear relationship.
Background and ObjectiveDespite the importance of medication adherence for chronically ill patients and the vast literature on its relationship to costs, this field suffers from methodological limitations. These are caused, amongst others, by the lack of generalizability of data sources, varying definitions of adherence, costs, and model specification. We aim to address this with different modeling approaches and to contribute evidence on the research question.MethodsWe extracted large cohorts of nine chronic diseases (n = 6747-402,898) from German claims data of stationary health insurances between 2012 and 2015 (t0-t3). Defined as the proportion of days covered by medication, we examined the relationship of adherence using several multiple regression models at baseline year t0 with annual total healthcare costs and four sub-categories. Models with concurrent, and differently time-lagged measurements of adherence and costs were compared. Exploratively, we applied non-linear models.ResultsOverall, we found a positive association between the proportion of days covered by medication and total costs, a weak association with outpatient costs, positive with pharmacy costs, and frequently negative with inpatient costs. There were major differences by disease and its severity but little between years, provided adherence and costs were not measured concurrently. The fit of linear models was mainly not inferior to that of non-linear models.ConclusionsThe estimated effect on total costs differed from most other studies, which highlights concerns about generalizability, although effect estimates in sub-categories were as expected. Comparison of time lags indicates the importance of avoiding concurrent measurement. A non-linear relationship should be considered. These methodological approaches are valuable in future research on adherence and its consequences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available