4.2 Review

Anticipatory prescribing in community end-of-life care: systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence since 2017

Journal

BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2022-004080

Keywords

clinical decisions; drug administration; home care; pain; symptoms and symptom management; terminal care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reviews the evidence published since 2017 on anticipatory prescribing of injectable medications for adults at the end-of-life in the community. It found that standardized prescribing of four medications for anticipated symptoms is common in the UK, but there is limited evidence on practices in other countries. Despite inadequate explanations, prescriptions are accepted by family caregivers who appreciate having access to medications. However, robust evidence on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of anticipatory prescribing is still lacking.
BackgroundThe anticipatory prescribing of injectable medications is recommended practice in controlling distressing symptoms in the last days of life. A 2017 systematic review found practice and guidance was based on inadequate evidence. Since then, there has been considerable additional research, warranting a new review. AimTo review the evidence published since 2017 concerning anticipatory prescribing of injectable medications for adults at the end-of-life in the community, to inform practice and guidance. DesignSystematic review and narrative synthesis. MethodsNine literature databases were searched from May 2017 to March 2022, alongside reference, citation and journal hand-searches. Gough's Weight of Evidence framework was used to appraise included studies. ResultsTwenty-eight papers were included in the synthesis. Evidence published since 2017 shows that standardised prescribing of four medications for anticipated symptoms is commonplace in the UK; evidence of practices in other countries is limited. There is limited data on how often medications are administered in the community. Prescriptions are 'accepted' by family caregivers despite inadequate explanations and they generally appreciate having access to medications. Robust evidence of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of anticipatory prescribing remains absent. ConclusionThe evidence underpinning anticipatory prescribing practice and policy remains based primarily on healthcare professionals' perceptions that the intervention is reassuring, provides effective, timely symptom relief in the community and prevents crisis hospital admissions. There is still inadequate evidence regarding optimal medications and dose ranges, and the effectiveness of these prescriptions. Patient and family caregiver experiences of anticipatory prescriptions warrant urgent investigation. PROSPERO registrationCRD42016052108

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available